Somebody asks about a job that closed eighteen months ago

Nothing was lost. Every file is where it should be, the drawings were archived properly, and the model opens without complaint. The answer was simply never written anywhere, so finding it means interrupting whoever remembers.

A project record spread across a light table, a drawing sheet marked with red revision clouds overlapping printed email correspondence, an addendum page and a transmittal slip held by a bulldog clip
01The problem

A firm's project record is complete and unusable at the same time. The decision exists inside an email thread, a marked-up sheet, an addendum and a meeting note, and reconstructing it means opening all four and knowing which one won.

So the question routes to a person. Four people get interrupted before anyone answers, and the answer arrives as a recollection rather than a citation. Nobody writes it down, so the same question costs the same four interruptions next quarter.

The cost is invisible because it never appears on a line item. It shows up as senior people who cannot get through their own work.

9.9RFIs per $1M of construction, at roughly $1,080 and eight hours each. Industry figures. A share of them start as a question the record could already have answered.
9.7day median RFI response. Industry figure. The clock runs while somebody looks for an answer that already exists.
02How this works
01

Read what the firm already produced

Drawing sets, revised sheets, specification sections, email threads, markups, issues, meeting notes, transmittals and addenda. No new system to populate, and no migration project.

02

Return the source with every answer

Each answer opens to the email, markup, sheet or specification section it came from. A reviewer confirms it in seconds rather than trusting a summary.

03

Treat a blank as a finding

When the record does not support an answer, the honest output is nothing, plus the name of the document that would have to exist. A confident guess about a closed project is worse than silence.

Take the free test See the Project Recall Agent
03Common questions

How do I find information buried in old project files?

The reliable method is to make the record answerable rather than to search it. Searching returns documents and still leaves a person to read them and decide which one governs. An answerable record returns the answer with the source page attached, so the reader confirms it rather than reconstructing it.

Can AI read construction drawings and specifications?

It can read the drawing set, the specification, the email threads and the markups, and it can answer questions about them with the source page attached. Judgement stays with a qualified professional. The value sits in retrieval and traceability rather than in replacing review.

What happens when the project record does not contain the answer?

The correct output is nothing, together with the name of the document that would have to exist for the question to be answerable. A blank is a finding about the record, and it is more useful than a plausible guess about a closed project.

Start here, free

How much of your bidding lives in one person's head?

The Standards Gap Test asks 40 questions about your symbol library, your assembly rules, and the conventions nobody wrote down. You answer from memory in 15 minutes, then you count how many answers only one person can give.

40
questions
11
pages
15
minutes
Free
you keep it
Take the test