Taking ten firms this quarter.See the 30-day Standards Build
The agents

Agents that estimate, level bids and qualify subcontractors.

Most architecture software gives every firm the same interface and expects the team to adapt. Mebbian works differently.

See how deployment works
01 / Source-traced02 / Your standards03 / Professionally reviewed
A floor plan open on a studio workbench, tallied by hand in red pencil, beside a printed quantity schedule, a scale ruler and index flags
00How an agent is built

Each agent is built around a specific piece of work your team already performs. It learns the documents involved, the standards your firm follows, the format the final work needs to take, and where a licensed professional must review the result.

The agent handles the repetitive work. Your team keeps control of the judgment. Nothing is submitted, issued, or treated as final without the approval path your firm defines.

01Estimating Agent

A first pass built from what your firm already paid.

Most of an estimate is memory. Which assembly your office actually uses for a wall type, what that assembly cost the last time you built it, and the allowance your team carries on this kind of project because of a job that went sideways years ago.

That knowledge sits with one or two people. When a job comes in that resembles one your firm already built, finding what it truly cost means opening old files, so most teams price it fresh.

The Estimating Agent reads your firm's own record and drafts the estimate from it. Each line carries the past job, the assembly rule or the price source behind it.

It hands the draft to your estimator. A number nobody can trace is a number nobody should sign.

An estimator's desk with a printed bid worksheet covered in handwritten unit costs, a calculator, and a laptop showing a spreadsheet of line items

What it reads

  • Your past bids and the jobs behind them
  • Your price book and historical unit costs
  • Your assembly rules and the way your office builds them up
  • PDF drawing sets and specification sections
  • Published cost data your firm subscribes to
  • The allowances and exclusions your team applies without discussing them

What it produces

  • A draft estimate in your format, your naming and your assumptions
  • The past job behind each line, and what that line cost then
  • The assembly rule applied, and where it is written down
  • A flag where this job differs from the one it resembles
  • A named blank where the record cannot support a number
  • The assumption register your reviewer works through

How your firm controls it

Your team defines the assemblies, the allowances, the exclusions and the price sources that count.

One firm carries a waste percentage on board and excludes openings below a threshold. Another counts every opening and carries corner studs at a standard allowance. Both are correct inside that firm.

The agent applies your firm's own method.

What stays with your estimator

The agent drafts and cites. Your estimator prices.

Every figure arrives with the source behind it, so a reviewer opens the past job and checks it. Commercial judgment on margin, risk and how badly your firm wants the work stays where it belongs.

Human review

The agent gathers, drafts and cites. A designated estimator decides. Every line shows its source, so a reviewer verifies it by opening the job it came from. Commercial judgment stays with your team.

02Bid Leveling Agent

Every subcontractor proposal on one line-by-line sheet.

Proposals arrive as PDFs in the days before bid day, each in its own format, each carrying its own exclusions buried in the fine print. Someone reads all of them and types the differences into a spreadsheet.

That job runs on the hours you have least of, in the window where a missed exclusion costs the most.

The Bid Leveling Agent reads every proposal that arrives and puts them side by side in your format. It surfaces what each one covers, what each one leaves out, and where two subs have priced different scopes against the same trade.

The gaps between proposals are the finding. That is where a job gets bought twice or missed entirely.

A stack of printed subcontractor bid proposals fanned across a desk with hand-marked notes in the margins, beside a legal pad carrying a hand-drawn comparison grid

What it reads

  • Subcontractor proposals as they arrive, in whatever format they arrive in
  • Your invitation to bid and the scope you sent out
  • The drawing set and specification sections the trade is pricing against
  • Addenda issued during the bid period
  • Your firm's own scope templates and trade breakdowns

What it produces

  • One comparison sheet per trade, in your format
  • Every exclusion each subcontractor wrote, pulled out of the fine print
  • Scope carried by two subs, and scope carried by none
  • Where a proposal prices against a superseded revision
  • A list of what to ask each subcontractor before bid day

What it leaves alone

The agent puts the proposals side by side. Your team picks the sub.

Relationships, past performance and whether a crew shows up in February are judgments your firm has earned. The agent surfaces the paperwork so those judgments happen on complete information.

Human review

The agent reads and organises. A designated team member decides. Every line on the comparison sheet opens to the page of the proposal it came from.

03Subcontractor Qualification Agent

Compare their drawings against yours before you award.

A subcontractor sends shop drawings or a marked-up scope, and it looks close enough. The place it differs from your set is where the money goes, and it surfaces after the award.

Comparing the two sheet by sheet is slow, so it happens under time pressure or it happens after the fact.

The Subcontractor Qualification Agent compares their drawings against yours and reports where the two disagree. It also gathers what the public record says about the business itself, against the criteria your firm sets.

Both halves land before you award rather than after.

Two construction drawing sheets laid side by side on a desk for comparison, a metal scale ruler across one and a red pencil on the other

What it reads

  • Subcontractor shop drawings and marked-up scopes
  • Your own drawing set and specification sections
  • The proposal and the exclusions attached to it
  • Public business records: registration, licensing and filings
  • Your firm's qualification criteria

What it produces

  • A sheet-by-sheet report of where their drawings and yours disagree
  • The quantity or assembly affected by each difference
  • What the public record shows about the business behind the bid
  • A check against your firm's own qualification criteria
  • A named blank where the public record holds nothing

How your firm controls it

Your team sets what qualifies a subcontractor for the size and type of work you run.

Firms differ on this, and the differences are real. The agent applies the criteria your firm holds rather than a generic score.

What it leaves alone

The agent reports differences and gathers records. Your firm awards the work.

Every criterion applied is one your team wrote down. The agent runs your standard consistently across every bidder and shows the evidence behind each check.

Human review

The agent compares and gathers. A designated team member decides. Every difference opens to both sheets, and every record shows its source.

04Project Recall Agent

Ask the record instead of the person who knows.

The Project Recall Agent reads what your firm has already produced and answers questions about it. What was decided about an assembly, when it was decided, who approved it, and against which clause.

It does not summarise a folder.

Every answer stays connected to the email, markup, sheet or specification section it came from, so a reviewer opens the source and sees where it came from.

When the record does not support an answer, it returns nothing and names the document that would have to exist. A blank is a finding.

Rolled construction drawing sets stacked against a studio wall beside a lamp, with an architectural massing model behind them

What it reads

  • PDF drawing sets and revised sheets
  • Specification sections
  • Project email threads
  • Markups, issues and comments
  • Meeting notes and transmittals
  • Addenda
  • Your firm's symbol library, assembly rules and conventions

What it produces

  • Answers with a link to the exact source page
  • The decision trail behind an assembly: what, when, who approved it
  • The rule your office applied, and where it is written down
  • A named blank when the record cannot support an answer
  • A list of what the record does not say and somebody has to decide

How your firm controls it

Your team defines what each mark on a drawing resolves to, which document takes precedence when two disagree, and which conventions apply on which project type.

One firm adds a waste percentage on board and excludes openings below a threshold. Another counts every opening and carries corner studs at a standard allowance. Both are correct inside that firm.

The agent applies your firm's own method.

Human review

The agent gathers and cites. A designated team member decides. Every answer shows its source, so a reviewer verifies it by opening the page. Engineering judgment stays with your team.

05Quantity Takeoff Agent

Counts and measures, traced back to the sheet.

The Quantity Takeoff Agent reads a drawing set and identifies the quantities your team needs from it: doors, windows, rooms, fixtures, wall lengths, floor areas, finish areas, equipment, or other defined elements.

It does not return one unexplained spreadsheet.

Every count and measurement remains connected to the drawing, sheet, and location it came from, so your team can review the result against the sheet it sits on.

Banded bundles of dimensional timber stacked in rows in a materials yard, beside a pallet of concrete blocks and a tied bundle of steel reinforcing bar

What it reads

  • PDF drawing sets
  • Floor plans
  • Reflected ceiling plans
  • Elevations
  • Schedules
  • Legends and keynotes
  • Addenda and revised sheets
  • Your firm's counting rules and classifications

What it produces

  • Itemized quantity schedules
  • Counts, lengths, and measured areas
  • Sheet and page references
  • Drawing annotations
  • Exceptions requiring review
  • Comparison between drawing revisions
  • Exportable tables for estimates, schedules, or downstream workflows

How your firm controls it

Your team defines what counts as an item, how duplicates are handled, which drawing takes precedence, and how the output should be organized.

A hospitality firm may count rooms, doors, and plumbing fixtures. A multifamily firm may organize quantities by unit type. Another firm may only want envelope assemblies and glazing.

The agent follows the firm's method on each project it runs.

Human review

The agent prepares and traces the takeoff. A designated team member reviews uncertain items, drawing conflicts, scope boundaries, and final quantities before the information is relied on.

06Energy-Code Calculation Agent

Turn the drawing set into a reviewable compliance package.

The Energy-Code Calculation Agent gathers the project information needed for the selected compliance path, organizes the calculations, and prepares a draft package for professional review.

Depending on the project and jurisdiction, this may include envelope assemblies, fenestration, lighting, mechanical inputs, climate-zone requirements, and supporting documentation.

An energy-code compliance form filled in by hand, beside a wall-section drawing showing hatched insulation layers, a code book and a calculator

What it reads

  • Project location and applicable jurisdiction
  • Adopted energy code and edition
  • Climate zone
  • Building use and occupancy information
  • Drawing set and specifications
  • Envelope assembly descriptions
  • Fenestration schedules
  • Lighting and mechanical information
  • Firm templates and prior approved submissions

What it produces

  • Organized project inputs
  • Draft compliance calculations
  • Envelope, lighting, or mechanical summaries
  • Missing-information requests
  • Conflicting-input flags
  • Draft compliance forms
  • Supporting calculation records
  • Review notes tied to the applicable requirement

What it does not do

It does not decide which code the jurisdiction has adopted without verification. It does not certify compliance. It does not sign or submit the package.

Commercial energy-code documentation may need to be prepared, signed, or submitted by a registered design professional depending on the jurisdiction and project.

Human review

The architect, engineer, energy consultant, or other responsible professional confirms the governing code, validates the inputs, resolves exceptions, and approves the final submission.

07Window U-value and R-value Agent

Build the performance schedule from the documents already on the project.

The Window U-value and R-value Agent reads the drawings, specifications, product information, and project requirements to prepare a coordinated schedule of envelope performance values.

U-factor describes overall heat transmission through an assembly and is most prominent for fenestration. R-value describes thermal resistance, particularly for insulation and opaque assemblies. The agent handles both, because a compliant envelope needs both.

It helps the team reconcile what is drawn, what is specified, what the code requires, and what is still missing.

A cutaway corner of an insulated double-glazed window unit standing on a printed fenestration schedule, beside a pair of calipers

What it reads

  • Door and window schedules
  • Wall, roof, and floor assemblies
  • Specifications
  • Product data and manufacturer literature
  • Energy-code criteria
  • Climate-zone requirements
  • Glazing types
  • Frame types
  • Insulation placement
  • Thermal-break and continuous-insulation information

What it produces

  • Fenestration U-factor schedule
  • Insulation R-value schedule
  • Assembly-level performance summary
  • Solar heat-gain coefficient fields where required
  • Product and source references
  • Missing-value requests
  • Conflicts between drawings and specifications
  • Exceptions requiring professional review
  • Draft notes for schedules or specifications

Why it matters

The information needed for envelope compliance is rarely in one place. A window schedule may identify the type, the specification may name the product, and the energy model may carry the performance assumption.

The agent brings those pieces together and shows the team where they agree, where they conflict, and where no approved value has been found.

Human review

The responsible architect, envelope consultant, energy professional, or engineer confirms the applicable criteria and approves the scheduled values before they enter the construction documents or compliance submission.

08Zoning and Envelope Agent

Know the site constraints before the design moves too far.

The Zoning and Envelope Agent assembles the rules affecting the site and compares them with the current project information. Envelope here means the legally buildable volume of the site, not the thermal envelope.

It helps the team identify the dimensional constraints, calculations, approvals, and unresolved interpretations that could affect the design.

Zoning regulations commonly address use, density, lot dimensions, setbacks, building height, open space, parking, projections, landscaping, and related site requirements. The exact rules remain jurisdiction-specific.

A site plan marked with setback lines and a hand-written height limit, beside a folded municipal zoning map and a chipboard massing model

What it reads

  • Parcel and site information
  • Zoning designation
  • Local zoning ordinance
  • Overlay districts
  • Adopted maps
  • Development standards
  • Applicable definitions
  • Site plans and massing studies
  • Prior interpretations supplied by the firm
  • Municipal correspondence
  • Variances, special exceptions, or entitlements already associated with the project

What it produces

  • Zoning summary
  • Permitted and conditional-use summary
  • Setback diagram
  • Height and story limits
  • Lot-coverage and floor-area calculations
  • Parking and loading requirements
  • Open-space or landscape requirements
  • Preliminary buildable-envelope diagram
  • Missing-document checklist
  • Questions requiring confirmation from the jurisdiction
  • Source-linked findings

What it does not do

It does not treat a model code as though it were the local ordinance. It does not assume that an online zoning map is current. It does not present ambiguous language as settled interpretation.

Every project must be tied to the rules adopted by the authority having jurisdiction and any project-specific approvals.

Human review

The architect, planning consultant, land-use counsel, owner, or appropriate municipal authority confirms interpretations that materially affect the project.

09Plan-to-TVR Agent

Turn the drawing set into a structured project assessment.

A TVR is a Technical Valuation Report: the technical write-up of what the building is and what it is worth building. This agent produces the first draft of one.

The Plan-to-TVR Agent reads the available plans and supporting project documents, extracts the relevant building information, and prepares a structured report for review.

Instead of asking a senior team member to reconstruct the project from multiple sheets and documents, the agent assembles the first draft and shows where every material statement came from.

A bound technical report open to a page of area and schedule tables, beside two rolled floor plans

What it reads

  • Site plans
  • Floor plans
  • Elevations and sections
  • Area schedules
  • Unit or room schedules
  • Project briefs
  • Zoning information
  • Specifications
  • Development assumptions
  • Cost or valuation inputs supplied by the firm
  • The firm's approved report template

What it produces

  • Draft project description
  • Structured building summary
  • Area and program tables
  • Source-linked observations
  • Assumption register
  • Risk and missing-information section
  • Questions for the project team
  • Draft feasibility or valuation narrative
  • Report formatted to the firm's template

What it extracts

Building type and proposed use. Gross and net areas. Floor and unit breakdown. Key dimensional information. Parking and access information. Program mix. Existing and proposed conditions. Construction or assembly assumptions. Development constraints.

And, explicitly, the missing or conflicting project information, so nobody discovers it later.

Human review

The agent does not determine market value, development viability, legal status, structural adequacy, or financial feasibility on its own. The qualified professional reviews the extracted facts, supplies the commercial or professional judgment, validates the assumptions, and approves the report.

10Agents Built for Your Firm

The most valuable agent may be the one no software company has named yet.

Every firm has recurring work that exists because of how that particular firm operates.

It may be a project-start checklist that only one principal fully understands. A proposal process built from five previous documents. A standards review performed differently for each project type. A weekly leadership report assembled from several systems. A recurring deliverable that requires someone to remember where everything lives.

That work can become an agent too.

A firm's standards binder open on tabbed dividers and printed process notes, beside manila folders and a workflow diagram sketched on graph paper

We map the workflow first

  • What starts the work
  • Who performs each step
  • Which documents and systems are involved
  • Which decisions rely on senior judgment
  • Where the process usually slows down
  • What the final output needs to contain
  • Who must review or approve it
  • What the agent is never permitted to do automatically

Then we build around your method

  • Your templates
  • Your terminology
  • Your standards
  • Your project types
  • Your approval structure
  • Your preferred output
  • Your existing tools
  • Your record of prior decisions

The result

It does not require the firm to adopt a generic workflow just because that is how the software was designed.

A repeatable piece of work becomes easier to start, faster to complete, and less dependent on one person remembering every step.

Human review

The agent prepares the work. Your people retain the judgment.

07Shared control

Every agent shows its work.

The value is not simply that an answer appears faster. The value is that your team can see what the answer was built from.

Which documents were used

Which drawing or page supported a result

Which rule or standard was applied

Which assumptions were made

What information could not be found

What changed between revisions

What still requires human judgment

Who reviewed and approved the output

That is the difference between useful software and guesswork with a clean interface.

08Where this comes from

This is the profession's own standard.

The review requirement is what the AIA already tells firms to do. We build to it.

AI is a design support tool—not a replacement for professional judgment.

Architects remain accountable for all work products, decisions, and representations made to clients, agencies, and the public—including work produced with AI assistance.

All AI-generated outputs must be reviewed and validated by qualified professionals.

Assign clear responsibility for oversight of AI tools and outputs.

The American Institute of Architects, Guidance for the Responsible Use of AI by Architecture and Design Firms. Last updated 22 October 2025.

On energy code specifically, COMcheck provides an optional way of demonstrating compliance with energy codes for new commercial or high-rise residential buildings, additions, and alterations, and covers ASHRAE Standard 90.1, the International Energy Conservation Code, and several state-specific codes. It is one compliance path among several, which is why the Energy-Code Calculation Agent confirms the governing code with a responsible professional before it calculates anything.

Building Energy Codes Program, U.S. Department of Energy, What is COMcheck and REScheck?.
Start here, free

How much of your bidding lives in one person's head?

The Standards Gap Test asks 40 questions about your symbol library, your assembly rules, and the conventions nobody wrote down. You answer from memory in 15 minutes, then you count how many answers only one person can give.

40
questions
11
pages
15
minutes
Free
you keep it
Take the test
Start with one repeated workflow

Start with the work your senior team should not have to reconstruct every time.

We map the workflow, identify the sources and approval points, and build the first agent around how your firm already works.

See how deployment works